Many people ask me why I go to Africa. What type of “business” do you teach. “Why are you spreading capitalism overseas when we can see what corruption it breeds here in the US?”
These are good questions and, if I am honest, some of the same questions that I asked myself before I first went. The answer is always formulated a little spontaneously on each trip (this will be my fourth). We have a prepared week-long course, but we find that the course changes with each new group of students. What is obvious in rural India might be novel in Africa and vice-versa.
One such challenge occurred in a course we taught in the Fall of 2004. We were teaching a group about budgeting in order to run a small business. Like most businesses, there had to be a carry over of funds from one month to the next to buy new inventory. (I think we were talking about a business that made and distributed men’s shirts). Carry over was quickly equated to “savings” by the class. Savings were almost taboo in this very poor society. In their culture, if one had any money, they were obliged to share it with any family member in need. There was always a family member in need, so……no savings, no inventory, no sustainable business.
Many people in the class struggled with this notion. Most of them were Christians, and it seemed very un-Christian for us to be teaching such things. Some people had savings, but they had to be kept more or less a secret, or a distant cousin was likely to show up for some assistance.
We struggled with how to explain this notion. One of our group, an entrepreneur from North Carolina, came up with an analogy that seemed to help. He explained, “Suppose you were extremely poor, but you had a chicken, and that chicken produced eggs. Each day you could eat the eggs and if someone in dire need came by, you could share the eggs with them. Now, what if someone in dire need wanted the chicken? If you were to give the chicken you would have neither a chicken or eggs, and both of you would be in dire need.” So the savings he explained, were like the chicken. They produced the income month after month so that in the long run, there was much more to share.
This simple analogy was powerful enough to move the class towards a collective questioning of a long-held set of values. Were we teaching them to be selfish or wise? I leave that to you to decide and comment upon. These are the real issues that we face each time we teach. In a future post, I will talk about the exportation of capitalism and the negative lessons of capitalistic imperialism.